Monday, July 21, 2014

Wowzer Pinot Noir from Toretti's Family Vineyard

During a short vacation up north we visited several Costcos along the way.  I spied the object of today's review at their Santa Maria location and thought about buying it but passed. After we left, even though I'd never heard of Toretti's Family Vineyard, I kept thinking I should have bought it because it seemed interesting.  Don't ask me why some wines look more interesting than others; they just do.

Well, I was redeemed with a second chance at the Goleta Costco.  That same wine was sitting there in the bin. There was another bottle that looked interesting too. Being that I had already bought some bottles earlier, I decided I would just get one.  I asked the guy in charge of the wine department which one he would recommend, saying I was looking for a more Burgundian style.

Without hesitation he pointed to the Toretti bottle, telling me it was a good one. Not one of those overblown fruit bombs. So without hesitation I purchased it.  This was back in May.

The other day I popped it open.  Good recommendation!  This is one mighty fine Pinot Noir that has plenty of varietal character. I guess I ought to specifically identify it - the Toretti's Family Vineyard Pinot Noir Inocencio Pinot Noir, 2009, Santa Barbara County (there's a picture of the label below).

I sensed it was going to be good when I saw the color - very light, somewhat translucent, like a Pinot Noir ought to look, rather than those opaque things that California likes to produce. The aromas - like the title of this post says, wowzers. It had that barnyard funk but very well integrated with strawberries and other red berries and an earthy character.  I just loved swirling the glass and waving it under my nose.

The promise of the color and the aromas followed through to the palate.  Nicely concentrated flavor, great backing acidity and a long, sort of peach pit minerally aftertaste made this all in all one really nice wine. The good thing is I am writing this after only consuming the first 1/4 of the bottle so I have my three 187 ml shares left to enjoy.  Of course the wine could just fade away over the next three days but I doubt it. I got so excited about how good of a Pinot Noir this was that I had to write about it right away.

The good part: it was $18.99 at Costco, a total bargain for a Pinot Noir of this quality.  I don't know if they have any left.  It is still available from the winery but there it is $44.00.  Is it worth $44.00?  Given what wines of this quality and character cost these days, especially from smaller producers, my answer is yes, it is. The Costco price was just a very fortunate bargain for me but this wine is worth what the Toretti family is pricing it for on their site.


This is a darn good wine and it has the acidity and balance to last longer but it sure is good now.

Saturday, July 19, 2014

cleanup

In my last post I mentioned how some of the wine-related links on my blog were out of date. Just now I went and cleaned them up so what you saw in this blog yesterday ain't what you are seeing now.

Over half of the links were deleted. A couple of them changed URL's so I updated those. I am glad to see that El Jefe of Twisted Oak is still writing his twisted blog posts albeit at a different web address and also with less frequency before.  I hope he isn't untwisting himself.

Some of the sites still exist but haven't been updated in a long time.  I was sad to see Dr. Debs Good Wines Under $20 site hasn't been updated since 2012 (almost as sad as my not even realizing this until just now since I haven't been keeping up with reading wine blogs), since that was always good reading.

Wine marches on, though. There's a whole slew of blogs out there that are waiting to be discovered and I need to get back into things.  Every day is so busy I barely have time to write this one, though, much less visit other sites but then that's probably a sign that I need to get my priorities straight!

Quick wine review - just finished the Kirkland 2012 Chardonnay, Russian River Valley, and it's a very nice bottle especially for a very reasonable $12.99.  No point in holding it, this is ready to drink now.  I noticed that over my normal four tastings that the aromas seemed to subside a bit and the oak got a little more prominent, but overall everything remained in balance.

Aromas of ripe tropical fruit and blossoms were pleasing to me, and they carried through to the palate. The fruit, oak and zippy acidity balanced each other and it was just a nice, tasty wine to sip.

Thursday, July 17, 2014

more conscientious

As I have said before, and those of you who visit this blog regularly know, I tend to post sporadically. In bursts.
 In the beginning I was on fire, posting left and right but then I ran out of ideas and got stale. Then I slacked off and didn't post for long periods of time, even over a year.

 Just recently after another prolonged bout of apathy I started posting again and I'm gonna give it the old college try and be more regular about it going forward.

I was looking at the "wine related links" on the left side of the page just now. They've been sitting there unchanged for who knows how long, and who knows if they are all still valid? I confess that in general, I haven't been keeping up with other wine blogs and that's another thing I need to be more regular about.

One thing I do know - that sizable vertical banner featuring Budo Kun, courtesy of Domaine547, still works. I visited the site the other day and wow, has that wine shop grown since the day I put the banner on this blog. I don't know if Budo Kun is even around anymore, but Jill has got some truly great wines in stock that are well worth seeking out. I wish her all the best because she's a really nice person who has succeeded in a difficult business.

I also visited wannabee wino's site and she has truly achieved winodom! Sonadora's another super nice person who would be my model for how to faithfully keep up a wine blog.

I'm going to have to clean up the rest of the links and just leave whatever still exists. Meanwhile, y'all come back now, hear?

Sunday, July 13, 2014

coffee filters for wine?

With my standard practice of splitting a 750 ml bottle of wine into four equal parts to drink on four successive days or evenings, I never take the time to decant anything. Some bottles throw a sediment, which I carefully try not to make a part of the liquid I pour into the three 187 ml bottles for later, or the wine glass for the day.

I've wondered what the effect would be of using a coffee filter to weed out the sediment as I pour.  Would the filter affect the wine?  Googling this question results in various pages on which people have wondered the same thing, but I figure nothing beats first-hand observation, right?

Recently I purchased these filters from Amazon.


They were chosen after reading several reviews in which people praised them for not adulterating the taste of their coffee like bleached filters did.  These were the most "natural" I could find.

My "testing" was done with filtered water poured from a Camelbak pitcher.  The steps were:
  1. Rinse a clean glass with the pitcher water.
  2. Pour a sample of pitcher water in the glass.  Smell it and taste it. 
  3. Pour out the remaining sample and rinse the glass again with pitcher water.
  4. Pour pitcher water into the glass but through one of the coffee filters.
  5. Smell the water and taste it.
  6. Repeat until satisfied I could make a valid conclusion.
What did I find?  The pitcher water had no aroma and no taste other than the taste of plain water. When I poured it through the coffee filter, there was definitely an aroma. Not strong but noticeable, like the filter paper. The water still tasted neutral, however, and the aroma dissipated quickly.  It wasn't a matter of my nose getting used to it as after I let it sit and came back to it, there was still no smell. 

My conclusion: the filter did add odor to the water but it blew off quickly.  If it does the same thing with wine then I should be okay.  I haven't tried it with wine yet.  I'll do that and report on it next time.

Now, how did the coffee filter do with filtering out particles?  I used another filter and poured some finely ground spices into it, then poured water through the filter into the glass. 

Visibly I could see no spice particles at all in the water in the glass but the aroma of the spices was very strong. They didn't go away, either.  The coffee filter seems to prevent the particles from entering the glass but my guess is microscopic particles from the spices are washed off by the water and permeate the coffee filter. They are too small to detect with the eye, but the nose isn't fooled. 

Not a truly rigorous scientific experiment, but nonetheless enough for me to conclude that perhaps it would be safe to use a coffee filter to prevent sediment from entering the glass.  Like I said, I will do this with some wine and find out what happens.  I used water first since its taste is neutral and any filter effects should have been more evident. 



Wednesday, July 9, 2014

some short stemware

Actually the title of this blog post is misleading but don't sue me.  It's really not stemware.  It's short, but there's no stem - which is the main reason why it is short.

Normally I don't like to drink wine out of a glass that has no stem.  This latest trend towards stemless glasses is not popular with me.

Nevertheless, I ended up buying a couple of stemless glasses recently.  I couldn't resist. They had a nice shape and they cost only $1.50 each. I found them at Daiso, which is sort of the Japanese equivalent of the 99 Cents Only Store that is so familiar to us. Unlike the 99 Cent store, however, there are items of various prices although most are $1.50 and all are pretty cheap.

Here's the glasses (click the pictures for the full version, then click outside the picture to return here):



The shapes initially attracted me and when I saw the little insert that said it was "European Thin Glass" and even better, "Ultra Thin Glass," I couldn't help but inspect them.

Indeed, these both had thin glass and the ultra thin was thinner than the thin.  Here's a view from the top so you can compare the thickness:


No Libby's soda bottle bottom thickness glasses here!  These are thin and light. Being that they cost only $1.50, I don't have to be paranoid when washing them, either.

I plan on using them when (if) the weather gets cold. So far this summer has been so hot I expect it to only trail off slowly in the winter before getting hot again.  It's ridiculous!

I'm a sucker for a nice wine glass.  And a nice glass of wine.

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

really tall stemware

During a recent vacation, my wife and I stopped at a Ross Dress For Less store in Santa Barbara. I'm not big on clothes so while she perused the racks in the women's department, I did what I always do when at Ross - perused the home goods section.

Every time we go, I have hopes of finding some nice wine glasses, and every time I am disappointed because all they have are Libby-like thick-walled and rimmed glasses with short stems, small bowls and when you look through them everything is distorted.  But being the optimist I am, I still hope.

And lo and behold, this time I was rewarded, in the last chance clearance section, no less.  The box looked promising but you never know what's inside. I pried open the lid and was surprised to find some elegant-looking stemware sitting inside (note: click on the picture to see it in its entirety; afterwards click outside the picture to return here).


Excuse the poor picture.  I don't know why I chose this background; I thought it would cut back on any glare but it also cut back on showing just how attractive these glasses are (and no, that's not my sofa).

They came two in a box, $6.99 per box.  The one on the left is 12" tall and the one on the right an inch shorter. Both have 6" stems. These are the tallest wine glasses I've encountered. They're made of crystal, with thin bowls and delicate stems but they do have visible imperfections.  What do you expect for $6.99?

Unfortunately there was only one box of each, and the box with the shorter stems had one with a broken stem. The cashier took 1/2 off the box with one stem so I ended up with three nice glasses for about eleven bucks, including tax.

The manufacturer is Home Essentials and the model is Paul Revere.  I tried finding more online but it seems it is discontinued.  Small wonder, as I am guessing these were in the clearance section because there was too much breakage.

I even broke the bowl of one of the tall ones when washing it for the first time. Grrr..  that left me with one of each, and triggered visits to all the nearby Ross stores around our house when we got back.  I managed to find only one box, this of the tall stems, and sure enough, one of the two was broken.  At this particular Ross the manager would only discount the single stem to five dollars even though half the contents were busted.

But hey, I gladly paid those five bucks and would have paid a lot more. Now I have two of the tall ones and one of the shorter ones and believe me, I am going to wash them very, very carefully.

I appreciate a lovely wine glass.  It makes the wine taste better.  I just wish I had found more of these.

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Vissani Wine Cooler - Update

Yesterday's blog was about a 16 bottle wine cooler under the Wine Enthusiast brand that I recently purchased. The blog title was, "Another wine cooler."

That may have given the impression that I no longer have the Vissani unit that I wrote about a couple of years ago (click here for the review), but that's not the case. The new one is in addition to the Vissani.  By the way, my apologies for misspelling the name in the original article.  It's VIssani, not VAssani.

After two years, how is it holding up?  I am happy to report, knock on wood, that it is doing quite well.  I done the same to the glass door as I did to my new unit, which is tape aluminum foil over it to keep out the light.  My thermometer indicates that the inside temperature ranges from 53.6 to 57.6 degrees.  The control is an old-fashioned dial, not one of those digital electronic ones so you have to set the temperature by trial and error.

Is this 4-degree range bad?  I don't think so.  The cooler isn't constantly cycling on and off.  I figure the temp inside is probably 57 degrees.  The air temperature may have that 4 degree range but I think the wine in the bottle maintains a more stable or constant temperature.  I could be wrong, though.  So far all of the wines stored in it seem fine to me.  I wouldn't want to store a Richebourg in it, like Sandra Oh's character did in her wine cooler in the movie Sideways, but for less expensive stuff that doesn't need a real long storage I think the Vissani is fine.

That particular model is no longer available.  I see Home Depot recently had a successor model on sale for $198 ($49 more than I paid for mine) but this one holds only 28 bottles and has electronic/digital controls. The reviews are not very good, either.  As I recall, mine also had mixed reviews but so far it has worked fine. I suspect many "bad" reviews are from people who expect too much, don't use it properly, or didn't wait for at least 24 hours before plugging it in.

Anyway, I just wanted to post a 2-year update and say that the Vissani is still working properly.  In this crazy Southern California heat, I'm thankful for that!

Saturday, July 5, 2014

New Arrival - Wine Enthusiast 16 Bottle Wine Cooler

A few weeks ago I purchased a small wine cooler, the Wine Enthusiast model 272-03-16-A.  Here's a picture of it:


That's not my kitchen counter, that's the picture from the Costco product page. I taped aluminum foil over the door glass because I want no light at all shining on the juice inside. I was worried that perhaps the inside light might accidentally turn on but when the room is dark you can see the light at the edge of the foil if it is on, so I'm fine with that.

I bought this from Costco's web site since they don't stock the unit in their warehouse.  Why from Costco? For one, the price ($149.99 including shipping) was a lot lower than anywhere else I saw this, and more importantly, Costco has the best return policy in the industry.  I don't believe in spending a lot of money for a wine cooler since regardless of price, they are notorious for not lasting a long time.  Therefore, why put a lot of money into an iffy investment?  But at least buying from Costco gives me the peace of mind that if anything goes wrong, they'll make it right.

How's it working?  Fine, so far.  I ordered it on a Sunday evening.  They drop shipped it from the Wine Enthusiast in New York on Monday and it reached my office in Southern California on Friday in fine condition. No dents in the unit or the box. I have to say, this was very well packed with lots of dense foam padding - not the cheap, stiff styrofoam that splinters into pieces, but the flexible, dense kind that does a better job of protection.  There was plenty of cardboard bracing, too.

After letting it sit for a day I plugged it in.  After a few hours the unit cooled to what the LED dial on the front panel said was 54 degrees.  My own thermometer said it was lower, so I changed the setting to 55 degrees. Since then it keeps the temperature at 54.1-54.3 degrees most of the time. Checking the minimum and maximum temps reveals a range of 53.8 to 54.7 degrees, which to me is pretty darn good.  The thing is quiet, too.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that it continues to perform in an admirable manner like that.  So far, I'm very pleased. It's attractive (though less so with my low class aluminum foil taped to the front door), fairly compact and works like it is supposed to work. The shelving is optimal for Bordeaux bottles (as is pretty much any other wine cooler) but normal Burgundy-type or Riesling bottles should fit with no problem. Egomaniac oversized fancy schmansy bottles or super tall bottles won't fit but then if you buy stuff like that then you should have better storage for them.  Oh, and Champagne bottles, same thing. I think most will fit if you don't mind a possibly torn label.

My rating on this unit is thumbs up.  For the price, it's a very good value.

Friday, July 4, 2014

disclaimer

Well here I am, back again after another typical extended absence.

When I first started this blog, I had all kinds of ideas about stuff and was eager to put them in writing and share. Then I started running out of ideas and got burned out and started forcing myself to come up with stuff which, in hindsight and even at the time I wrote it, wasn't all that good. I still think I came up with some zinger posts early on, though.

Then I got boring.

Maybe I'm still boring but I feel like writing again so we'll see just how long that lasts.

First off, though, I would like to issue a disclaimer.

The title of this blog, One Wine Per Week, is not necessarily accurate. Yes, sometimes I drink one wine per week but on average I drink more than one wine per week. I average about 1.5 to 1.75 wines per week using my system of splitting a 750 ml bottle into 4 portions, drinking the first one on day one and then the next three on subsequent days.

And also, the title of this blog is not a guarantee that I am going to be writing about one wine per week so there is no contract, either express or implied, between me and you, that should lead to any expectation on the part of the reader that I will be delivering one wine per week to anyone.

Now that I got that administrative stuff out of the way, it's time to get back into this blog.

Happy 4th of July to all! I recently had the Tangent 2012 Albarino, Edna Valley Paragon Vineyards bottling that I purchased from a Costco up north for a very reasonable $11.49. This would make a wonderful wine to celebrate the day, especially here in sweltering Southern California.

Right away it was agreeable. A fresh-looking light yellow-gold, it had nicely fruity and flowery aromas: honeyed jasmine is the way my nose thought about it (assuming my nose can think). It was lip-smacking good on the palate, with juicy pineapple, peach and apricot flavors set off with vibrant acidity. The Tangent web site says they make wines that are meant to be enjoyed young and fresh and they sure hit the mark with this one. It was delicious.